The Tech-pert: 5 Things You Should Know About the Kindle Fire, Amazon’s New Tablet

featured-image-2978778

The word “game-changer” gets thrown around a lot, but that’s exactly what the Amazon Kindle Fire is. Not because it’s especially innovative–7-inch color tablets are nothing new–but because it’s cheap. As you probably heard yesterday following its introduction, Amazon has priced the Fire at $199. That’s a shot across not only Apple‘s bow, but also RIM‘s, Samsung‘s, and even Barnes & Noble‘s. This latter group sells 7-inch tablets–the BlackBerry PlayBook, Galaxy Tab Wi-Fi, and Nook Color, respectively–for $499, $349.99, and $249. And of course the iPad 2 (which, granted, has a 10-inch screen) starts at $499.

At $199, the Fire obviates the question, “Why do I need a tablet?“, and replaces it with, “Heck, it’s only 200 bucks! I’ll figure out later what it’s for.”

What it’s for, of course, is reading books and magazines, listening to music, updating Facebook and Twitter, watching TV shows and movies, playing games, checking e-mail, browsing the Web, and running apps of all kinds. What would you rather pay for those capabilities: $200 or $500? Thought so.

As I noted in my review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab Wi-Fi, which last April I considered to be the best iPad alternative you could buy, the 7-inch form factor is both more comfortable and more practical. (I say this as the owner of comparatively mammoth and unwieldy iPad 1.)

Of course, before you get into Amazon’s virtual line to preorder the Kindle Fire, there are a few things you should consider:

  1. Battery life. Don’t expect the Fire to last for weeks and weeks on a charge like a traditional Kindle. Amazon promises up to eight hours of continuous reading, but if you use it heavily for things like Web browsing and media streaming, you might be lucky to get two or three hours. In my experience with Android-powered tablets, battery life is a major Achilles’ heel.
  2. The Amazon ecosystem. One of the best things about the iPad is the built-in iTunes store, which provides easy access to music, movies, TV shows, books, and the like. No other tablet offers such a rich supporting ecosystem–except for the Fire. That’s one major reason I think it will be a bigger hit than all previous iPad challengers.
  3. Lock in. The downside to Amazon’s ecosystem is that it’s Amazon’s. Consequently, you probably won’t be able to run, say, the Barnes & Noble Nook app, or Netflix or Hulu. Amazon wants you to consume its media, not its competitors’. This kind of “lock in” has always been an issue with e-readers, but here it extends to other kinds of content as well.
  4. No cameras. I don’t consider this a deal-breaker by any means, but it’s worth noting that most competing 7-inch tablets have front- and/or rear-facing cameras. The Fire can display photos and videos, but it can’t capture them. Again, I can’t recall a single time while using my iPad or Nook Color that I thought, “Gee, I wish this thing had a camera.” But you may consider that an important feature.
  5. No 3G. Many competing tablets offer a 3G option, meaning the Internet goes where you go–you don’t have to find a Wi-Fi hotspot every time you want to, say, stream music from your Amazon account or open a Web page. My guess is that Amazon will offer a 3G-equipped Fire down the road, but for now it’s a Wi-Fi-only device.

What are your initial impressions of the Kindle Fire. Think you’ll buy one? Will you wait for some hands-on reviews before making your decision? Or do you think this whole tablet thing is much ado about nothing? Share your thoughts in the comments!

Self-proclaimed cheapskate Rick Broida has been a technology writer for over 20 years. He has authored over a dozen books, including, most recently, “How to Do Everything: Palm Pre.” Currently he writes the Cheapskate blog.

Comments (125)

Leave A Comment

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. ChuckG

    3 years ago

    It’s that first generation thing, once you know they work the bugs out, once they discover what they might be, then I’ll get excited.

    Comment
  2. SavingsIQ

    3 years ago

    I agree with ChuckG. First generation devices usually need time to work out the kinks. Plus, I’m an Apple fan. iPad all the way.

    Comment
  3. DJAmbient

    3 years ago

    I’m on board with the Fire for $200. It’s going to do all the things I want it to do and do it fast for a great price. I’m basically going to use it inside the house for all the things you stated – it’s a quick and easy tool for reference and email. I don’t need 3G and don’t need it, it will always be in range of my wifi signal. There are apps I’d love to have that the iPad has that I know won’t ever be on the Fire but I’ve lived without them so far. My only gripe about the Fire is there’s no SD or thumb drive port. I still like sneaker ware for a variety of reasons and it’s one of my all time gripes with all the Apple iDevices. I do think it would have been cool to have dual cameras so this could be used for teleconferences. Amazon could offer some Skype like service and even make some money off of it.

    Sure it’s designed to bring you under the Amazon umbrella but at least that’s pretty obvious. Everything about the iDevices ties you in a death grip to iTunes unless you’re willing to jump through hoops. My inside joke on the iDevices never having keyboards is because Apple hasn’t figured out a way to charge per keystroke.

    Comment
  4. Kenny01

    3 years ago

    Disagree about the Amazon Ecosystem. It’s great, no question about that, but almost every other Android tablet has access to it as well, whether it’s through the Amazon App Store or the Kindle App.

    Comment
  5. ashleywade

    3 years ago

    I honestly don’t see the point in purchasing a tablet if there’s no 3G capabilities. You can only go so far with wifi.

    Comment
SCRATCH DEBUG :: not set